Dale, attention to detail. I just posted an editorial from a London newspaper that took issue
with a recent statement by your President. Being that I didn't write the editorial, I didn't attack
anyone. I posted the article for the benefit of those paragons of virtue—those guardians of the
world's morals—who've turned their attention away from the filth and refuse collecting at their
own doorsteps.
Since you did raise a number of questions, though, I feel obliged to respond. Firstly, Western
Europe is not socialist. If there are any countries in Europe that can be perceived as socialist,
it's the countries that Rumsfeld is banking on in Eastern Europe that haven't yet made the full
transition to a market economy. They are for the most part in dire economic straits and their
leaders are hoping to get something in return for their support of the US with regard to Iraq,
although their people are strongly against the perpetual war for the elusive perpetual peace
that your President is propounding. Turkey is in the same boat and it's milking the US—better
said, US taxpayers; Cheney's Halberton and the other US oil concerns on the other hand are
going to make a fortune—for every cent they can get, and they are doing a good job too! (Now
Andy, if this is the "moral" support that the US has, I'll just grin and bear it. LOL!)
Yes Dale, I feel that any system of government that stifles the initiative of the governed is
doomed to fail. A person who is motivated and industrious is penalized for his motivation and
industry, although society is dependent precisely on the freedom of initiative of the individuals
who comprise it—if it is to flourish.
Conversely, a society in which a sense of proportion is lacking—a society in which the initiative
of private individuals crosses a threshold whereby their actions are injurious rather than
beneficial—is also doomed to fail. I'm talking about the flip-side of the coin: Greed. In Philip
Barry's 1939 stage play »The Philadelphia Story«—made immemorable by Cary Grant and
Katharine Hepburn in the 1940—there's an interesting exchange between C.K. Dexter Haven
(Grant) and Tracy Samantha Lord (Hepburn). The following is from the film version:
C.K. Dexter Haven: I never saw you looking better, Red. You're getting that fine tawny look.
Tracy Samantha Lord: Oh, going to talk about me, are we? Goodie.
C.K. Dexter Haven: It's astonishing what money can do for people, don't you think so Mr. Conners
(James Stuart)? Not too much, you know, just more than enough.

»Not too much, you know, just more than enough« Greed. On a page towards the back of a 1993
issue of the New York Times it was reported that the top 1% or so was earning over 90% of US
earnings. No you won't see this reported on television between innings, or on CNN or CBS Nightly
News, but the middle class is dying out, slowly but surely, while the rich are getting richer. Dale, I
just don't know how one would go about making a virtue of it.
Living here in Germany I just don't see what I saw living in New York City. People begging in front of
supermarkets and in the subways, people sleeping on park benches in the summer and over heating
vents in the winter—and this in the good ole USA! I remember one black man in particular: He didn't
have any shoes and wore plastic bags over his feet. He had a sore on his ankle about the size of a
silver dollar. This wasn't just a blister. He had this for quite some time and the skin just wouldn't
grow over the wound anymore. Considering that he was living from hand to mouth and most certainly
wasn't eligible for any »socialist« medical benifits, I couldn't but help to think that he'd eventually die
because of it. The thought of that man follows me to this day and embodies everything rotten about
greed.
Yes, Bush is so concerned about the poor Kurds in the north of Iraq and the Sunnis in the south. I just
find it odd that the poverty and squalor at his doorstep in Washington, D(eath) C(apital) leaves him so
unmoved.